DocumentationAccount

Runtime vs Daytona

Runtime and Daytona both run AI agents in isolated Linux sandboxes; Runtime bills the CPU your code uses, not the CPUs it holds.

This page compares the two for teams looking for a Daytona alternative. Facts about Daytona come from its public pricing and documentation, checked 22 September 2026; check the links at the end before relying on them. Equal vCPU counts do not prove equal performance, and the two services have not been benchmarked against each other.

At a glance

Runtime Daytona
Isolation Firecracker microVM for every sandbox Container sandboxes and VM sandboxes
CPU billing $0.025 per vCPU-hour of measured CPU, with a small floor $0.0504 per allocated vCPU-hour
Memory billing $0.0075 per reserved GiB-hour $0.0162 per GiB-hour
Disk Included while running; paused storage $0.08 per GB-month First 5 GiB free, then $0.000108 per GiB-hour, stopped or not
Plan fee None; prepaid credit from $10 None published
Free start 20 sandbox hours, no card $200 of compute
Pause and resume Files and memory, every sandbox Files and memory on VM sandboxes
Regions One US and EU
GPUs and Windows Neither Both

Cost for the same job

Take 1,000 runs of a 2 vCPU, 4 GiB sandbox. Each run lasts 60 seconds and keeps the CPU busy for 20 CPU-seconds, which is typical of an agent that spends most of its time waiting for a model.

TextRuntime  CPU    1,000 × 20 s / 3,600 × $0.025      = $0.14         Memory 1,000 × 60 s / 3,600 × 4 × $0.0075 = $0.50         Total                                        $0.64Daytona  CPU    1,000 × 60 s / 3,600 × 2 × $0.0504 = $1.68         Memory 1,000 × 60 s / 3,600 × 4 × $0.0162 = $1.08         Total                                        $2.76

Daytona bills the vCPUs a sandbox has for as long as it runs. Runtime bills the CPU the sandbox measurably used, with a default floor of a twentieth of a vCPU. With both CPUs busy for the whole minute, the same job costs $1.33 on Runtime and $2.76 on Daytona. Disk, network, taxes and free credits are excluded from both. See pricing for Runtime's terms.

Where Daytona is stronger

  • GPUs and Windows. Daytona offers GPU sandboxes and Windows machines. Runtime has neither.
  • Regions. Daytona runs in the US and the EU. Runtime runs in one region.
  • Credits. Daytona starts accounts with $200 of compute and runs a startup program. Runtime's trial is 20 sandbox hours.
  • Snapshots and forks. Runtime's are paused while an issue is fixed; build a custom image to start many sandboxes from one setup.

Where Runtime is stronger

  • Cost for agents that wait. CPU you do not use is not billed.
  • One kind of sandbox. Every Runtime sandbox is a microVM with its own kernel, and every one can pause with its memory. There is no class to choose.
  • Setup by the agent. An agent runs npx withruntime run --trial -- ..., shows you a link, and starts work once you approve it in the browser. No API key is copied into a prompt or a config file, and the MCP server reuses the same connection.
  • Safe retries. Every write takes an idempotency key, and the SDKs retry with one automatically, so a lost response does not create a second sandbox.

Moving from Daytona

Daytona:

JavaScriptimport { Daytona } from "@daytonaio/sdk";const daytona = new Daytona();const sandbox = await daytona.create();const response = await sandbox.process.executeCommand("python3 -c 'print(6 * 7)'");await sandbox.delete();

Runtime:

TypeScriptimport { Sandbox } from "withruntime";const box = await Sandbox.create({ funding: "trial" });try {  console.log((await box.exec("python3 -c 'print(6 * 7)'", { check: true })).stdout);} finally {  await box.stop();}

To have a coding agent make the switch, test it and compare costs on your own workload, give it the prompt in migration. Keep Daytona available until the same job passes on both.

Sources

Try for free

Was this page right?